Wednesday 10 April 2013

130410


"An elitist stream of consciousness does not constitute a rebuttal." ….. Sean W.
I agree, Sean W. Methinks the best of them are decidedly intelligently designed to encourages further constructive thought for future creative transparent dealogue in/between/with/within smarter beings/SMARTR Virtual Machinery? Although/And in others, raise doubts about it and IT's Media Abilities to prove the premise true and real, via virtual means and memes with ……. well, let us just call such Creative CyberSpace IT Command and Control with Computers and Communications, NEUKlearer HyperRadioProActive and Quantum Communication Control System ITERative ….. Entangling.
..........................................................................................................................................
Posted by amanfromMars on 04/10/13 12:43 AM … on http://thedailybell.com/28958/Apparatchiks-or-Journalists
"Conclusion: They are acting to some degree as apparatchiks not journalists." …. Daily Bell
I do believe I am in full agreement with that conclusion, DB, and with regard to the information which is touted as being available on …. http://www.icij.org/blog/2013/04/why-we-will-not-turn-over-offshore-files-government-agencies ….. is the following fully supportive of transparent action and does encourage transparent proaction to avoid all of the pitfalls and temptations of subjective vetting of information. It does appear however to be unwelcome.
Publish it all in its entire complexity and not be damned at all in eternity, or be realised as easily manipulated with a subjective conscience and/or consciousness as all of the rest playing dodgy Great Games. Keep IT Stupidly Simple and let others do all the scurrying and worrying about that which they know they shouldn’t have done, for nothing more precious than the very peculiar and most particular love of artificial money?
Which is/was a submission on April 8th to http://www.icij.org/blog/2013/04/why-we-will-not-turn-over-offshore-files-government-agencies which doesn't appear despite jumping through the ICIJ Facebook posting hoops. I wonder why not whenever it should have appeared? And is Facebook, really virtual spyware phishing for sensitive information and searching for advanced intelligence?
----


..................................................................................................................


Posted Wednesday 10th April 2013 08:32 GMT amanfromMars 1 …. speculating to accumulate on http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2013/04/10/crocus_aim_mjm/
Incestuous Virtual Circles which Generate Ponzi Wealth with the QE Supply of Pretty Paper
Is IARPA the new name for DARPA or an expansion of them? .... Gene Cash Wednesday 10th April 2013 07:03 GMT
Methinks IARPA is an In-Q-Tel type clone and another inventing constructive funding stream to be fed with paper dollars to fund the American Dream model of existence.
And In-Q-Tel is a clone/arm of Qinetic which does the same sort of thing for the MOD, or it used to for Blighty? Although some would tell you that they could still be doing that peculiar service particularly badly in these postmodern virtual reality times.
The world is full of such parasitic streams that just appear to churn and launder cash through and into the Money System and systems which just loves its easy purchasing power ..... for with cash, now both in paper and digital electronic forms, can you buy anything virtually for free, although anonymously is something one needs to be more careful about, as that is trickier if you have something/anything to hide. Indeed, there are those businesses/programs/agencies/bods and bots which would warn you that it is nowadays impossible to hide the movement of monies and all transactions are a matter of record, which does have one asking a lot of pertinent impertinent questions as to why trillions are supposed to be lost everywhere whenever they are just stolen by perps known to the system.
Maybe the system is totally corrupt to its core and right down through all of its executive head office administrations?
Nice one, BOE, and not so much an Old Lady but rather more the Expensive Whore of Threadneedle Street?
............................................................................................................................................

No comments: