Monday, 16 June 2014

140616

Admiral/NSA/Cyber Command/Sandra, Hi,
The problem and enigmatic dilemma that Uncle Sam needs to grasp and resolve, rather than constantly ignore and consistently avoid, in order to even begin to try and be effective in the Cyber Realm and ITs Live Operational Virtual Environments, is revealed in this post ...... http://www.amanfrommars.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/140615.html
Deny its truth if you will, but defense of the indefensible and inequitable is that which destroys with increasingly rapid certainty, all such systems, and nowadays is highly focussed personnel targeting of prime sub-prime movers and shakers of those systems, the means of delivering required change.
But such is just a refinement of the old system way of doing things, which first degrades and destroys command and control forces before engaging further on a shocking awful scale.
Uncle Sam serves the wrong master and attempts to preserve a corrupt system of virtually remote anonymous global administration with ponzi paper ...... fools' gold wealth which is easily manipulated and created but does have to be distributed to those with a much better idea as to how to spend it creatively to be successful and lauded.
.......................................................................

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Я бы даже указал номер счёта, благодаря этому процесс значительно ускорится; кинетика стартует не менее, чем через 6 месяцев после перечисления известной суммы.

Casey Evans said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

That's not very correct, CE. Later tonight, OK?

Casey Evans said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Why on Earth should they be a bad thing or a good thing, Casey Evans? They are, in common meaning, just account numbers. Why should they mean anything to national security, especially if it isn't a matter of discussion?

Re Google Translate - "I *would* even point an account number, etc"..."it would accelerate the process"..., further's translated properly, except "*the* kinetics".

Casey Evans said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

"I was referencing the undocumented technology that was published on this website" - do you mean developing the supply of anti-energy? I maybe running ahead of the train, but can it really be an issue of national security whenever it's the most sensitive topic of the *international* one which informally supersedes any and all local motivations and therefore dictates its rules over them?

For real, that's not the cookie one can chew under one's pillow in private, Casey Evans, but sorry, now me hasn't come for it if you have some. Lucky you if you can explain your discovery in terms and formulas to share with all and gain a free beer in every campus beside many other good things. I know one guy who can't - there is no formulas for this particular case.

(Some might also like to add that there's something strange and improper in the word "anti-energy". It follows that it produces *anti-work*? We must try to find something else instead of this word).

ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/technology/warp/warpstat_prt.htm

I also have a slightest suspicion that the Hyperspace may be referred to all these web thingies. OK, OK, leavin'.