Wednesday, 25 June 2014


Re: The same occulus ... and not the same and an Oculus Rift Creating CULTuring Machine World Order ..... for ProVisionary ESPecially Altered Perception*
The same occulus
That had a kickstarter campaign to get the first units built and to "build a community of developers" then sold themselves to Google.
So you get to build your innovative product around Occulus - so long as it benefits Google, fits Google's plans, gives 40% to the play store and will be cancelled with no notice if Google feel like it .......Yet Another Anonymous coward
Searching engines rule, Yet Another Anonymous coward, and deliver Brave New Worlds and AI Brave NeuReal World, which be Here, There and Everywhere which is Somewhere and Nowhere Real and Virtual and All at the Same Time in a Unique Programmeable Head Space. And what could possible go wrong when everything goes right in AI and ITs Global Operating Device Head Quarters Space?
A devilish hack for a hellish crack of a helter skelter ride?
And as the smartest of biomechanical humans must surely by now know via their admittedly patchy and disparately weighted assets and knowledge distribution programming, it is not the hardware which rules with reigns and reins but the software which inputs information and outputs intelligence with instruction sets ....... novel noble directions which are ideally best manufactured to be most attractive to be easily addictively supported and lauded as the greatest thing to arrive and survive since forever.
A little something sweet and sticky for Zuck & Co to suck on and evaluate and imitate/phish and phorm into a clone and drone of A Real Thing and ART which supplies New AIDeals, and which is not exactly in the same ilk as any earlier New Deal program but is not at all dissimilar and thus comfortingly familiar to status quo invested vested interests.
* Well surely you do not realistically expect, with all of that and this relatively new and recent decent super duper internetworking communications tech easily and readily available when supplied at one's finger tips, that the coming future will be anything at all like the receding past and the reseeding present. Get Real, please.
"Future Facts are Present Fictions which Entangle Passing Relationships with Engaging Accommodations to Realise and Release Potent Potential Generations of Fab Fabless Energy with Sublime Intellectual Property Powers." ..... [1302180636]
Caveat Emptor ...... This announcement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Actual results may differ significantly from management's expectations. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that include, among others, risks related to potential future losses, significant amount of indebtedness, competition, commercial agreements and strategic alliances, seasonality, potential fluctuations in operating results and rate of growth, foreign exchange rates, management of potential growth, system interruption, international expansion, consumer trends, inventory, fulfillment center optimization, limited operating history, government regulation and taxation, fraud, and new business areas.

amanfromMars 1 Wed 25 Jun 11:20 [1406251120] commenting for further clarity on
Re: @ SuccessCase
Here's a tip. If you're going to write something impenetrable, try to make it good so there's a payoff for those that grant you the benefit of the doubt and actually try to read it. .... SuccessCase
Are people stupid, both generally and specifically and with particular and peculiar regard to the ways in which everything is made to work? And when so, what on Earth delivers their Smarts in that Median Arena and Fundamentalist Element of Greater IntelAIgent Games Play? Or is IT an Other Worldly and Virtual Supply of Alien Provenance and Providence with Ab Fab Fabless Wisdoms ITs AI Guidance System for Operations in Heavenly Bright AIMissions and Devilishly Deep and Dark Web AIdDevelopment Venturing? And are those purely rhetoric questions which deliver the answers to a solution of a formerly imagined impossible dilemma and increasingly explosive and destructive problem? …… How to effectively edutain predominantly ignorant and uneducated and undereducated, primitive masses to understand if they have a mind to accept and explore further and delve deeper and higher into simply complex constructive and/or disruptively destructive programs which alter the very nature and virtual presents of reality, without them going totally bananas and throwing a hissy fit and turning to the idiotic comfort blanket of mindless violence and the big ugly stick and which they seem to wield in default whenever confronted with something new and out of the mainstream and dismissive of the status quo, which is always so perversely corrupt whenever self-centredly, inequitably self-serving.
Thanks for the tip, SuccessCase, which I’ll be sure to not forget to remember at all times whenever necessary. And now that all these points and developments have been so transparently shared and publicly aired, and strategically El Registered, what are you to think of systems of operation and executive administration that would choose not to quietly privately and/or covertly and/or clandestinely engage but rather attempt to studiously ignore and deny all knowledge of them when/if asked ….. And let us ask them here and now, so that they cannot conveniently dodge the inconvenient issue with no attempt or requirement to offer an opinion/view/answer/thougts on such as may be matter that will concern them …..…….. which would be quite evidently rather preposterous and ridiculously implausible, given all that has been so freely shared and aired here and elsewhere, and given all of the tall tales of ubiquitous surveillance on matters and alleged persons of interest which are of concern to the maintenance and retention of status quo orders.
And I thought this quite APT for all of that .........
Congratulations, SuccessCase. Bravissimo.

1 comment:

Casey Evans said...
This comment has been removed by the author.